Press and Journal

Switch to desktop Register Login

How you elect members of Middletown Borough Council is on the table for Wednesday's meeting


A possible change in how Middletown residents elect members of borough council will be taken up by the council during its next meeting on Wednesday, Aug. 3.

Council normally meets Tuesday, but the meeting has been changed to Wednesday because Tuesday is National Night Out.

In addition, the start time of Wednesday's meeting has been moved up to 6:30 p.m.  Council wants to allow more time for public input and for discussion regarding the change, which would mean getting rid of the current system by which councilors are elected from one of three wards in the town.

Instead, all nine councilors would be elected by residents from throughout all of Middletown.

The change would also reduce the size of borough council from the current nine members to seven - the minimum required by state law.

For the past 45 years - since 1971 - Middletown has been divided into three wards - the First, Second, and Third - with each ward electing three members of the nine-member council.

Each ward is supposed to equally represent one-third of the town in population - to in theory ensure that residents from each part of the town are equally represented on the council.

The First Ward sends three members to council from the southwest portion of Middletown. The Second Ward sends three members from the middle part of the town, while the Third Ward elects three members from the north and east sections of the borough.

MiddletownWardsThis map shows the current three wards in Middletown. The lower left sections are the First Ward, the two sections in the middle are the Second Ward, and the two sections on top are the Third Ward. Each ward has two voter precincts.

But with today's technology such as cell phones, e-mail and social media like Facebook, these geographic boundaries are outdated and no longer relevant, contends Mayor James H. Curry III, who is pushing the change.

Several councilors who agree with Curry on getting rid of the wards say that all members of council today respond to the needs of all borough residents, regardless of what ward the resident lives in.

And while the wards are supposed to guarantee equal representation on council from all three sections of town, the wards in fact are no longer equally balanced in terms of population.

For example, an exodus of residents brought on by the 2011 flooding has reduced the Third Ward's share of the borough's overall population to just 28 percent of the whole, according to U.S. Census data that was used to set state House and Senate distriicts in 2012.

The First Ward also lost residents to the flood, and to the razing of multiple properties acquired by Harrisburg International Airport through the airport's noise abatement program. But the First Ward still has 31 percent of Middletown's total population.

The end result is that a disproportionate share of the borough's population - 41 percent - now lives in the Second Ward.

Under law the three wards are subject to being reapportioned every 10 years, Heidi Havens, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, told the Press And Journal in 2015.

If the borough doesn't act to redraw the ward boundaries to bring them into balance population-wise, one or more registered voters in the town can petition county court to force the issue, Havens said.

As for reducing the size of council, Curry says that Middletown has too many elected officials for a town its size - compared to surrounding municipalities - and that going from nine to seven councilors would make borough government more efficient.

The mayor says now is the time to make the change, because council is already down to seven members because of the recent resignations of Robert Louer St. from the First Ward and Ed Shull from the Third Ward.

Reducing the size of council now means that no existing councilors would lose their seat, and council would not have to fill either of the vacancies, Curry has said.

Right now it would appear the Curry has three councilors solidly in support of the change - President Ben Kapenstein, Vice-President Damon Suglia, and First Ward Councilor Dawn Knull.

Three other councilors either oppose the change outright, or oppose council making the change now. - such as First Ward Councilor Robert Reid - or say that the matter should be put before voters in a referendum that could go on the ballot in 2017. That is the position that has been expressed by Third Ward Councilor Diana McGlone and Second Ward Councilor Anne Einhorn.

Most adamant in speaking out against the change has been First Ward Councilor Robert Reid, the borough's former long-time mayor. Reid said that he sees no problem with the ward system, and that First Ward voters would no longer be adequately represented on the council.

Third Ward Councilor Diana McGlone and Anne Einhorn of the Second Ward both say that council should allow voters to decide the issue in a referendum that could be held in 2017.

That leaves as the potential key vote that of council's newest member, Ian Reddinger, who was appointed less than three months ago to fill the Second Ward seat vacated by Greg Wilsbach.

Reddinger has told the Press And Journal he supports getting rid of the wards and reducing the size of council, but that he will vote in accordance with the wishes of Second Ward residents.

If one or more councilors is absent Wednesday and a tie vote occurs, Curry could break the tie in favor of making the change.

The most council can do Wednesday is direct the solicitor to draft and advertise an ordinance to make the change. A second vote would have to take place at a later meeting before the change can go into effect.

Last Updated on Friday, 29 July 2016 12:36

Hits: 48

Zoning board deadlocks 1-1, crematory issue heading for county court

jessicahuntcrematorymeetingPress And Journal Photo by Dan Miller -- Jessica Hunt of North Pine Street in Middletown objects to the crematory following the zoning board's 1-1 vote.

The matter of whether to allow a crematory as a permitted use at the Fager-Finkenbinder Funeral Home at 208 N. Union St. in downtown Middletown is heading for Dauphin County Court.

The Middletown Zoning Hearing Board on Tuesday July 26 voted 1-1 in deciding an appeal that crematory opponents had filed of the use permit that was granted to the funeral home in June 2015 by former borough zoning officer Jeff Miller.

A split vote means that the appeal is rejected and the permit stands as issued, said David Wion, solicitor for the zoning board. The board has three members, but Tom Germak recused himself after witnesses called by lawyers for the funeral home testified that Germak had made comments suggesting he was biased against the crematory.

The opponents will appeal the board's ruling to county court, Aanon Martin, lawyer for the opponents, said immediately following the announcement of the split decision.

"This vote shows the danger of proceeding with a board of only two rather than three," Martin said. "We believe we were 100 percent correct under the law, and the appellants will continue with this onto the court of common pleas and we will ask a judge to overturn this result."

Travis Finkenbinder, president/owner of the Fager-Finkenbinder funeral home in Middletown as well as four other funeral homes in the surrounding area, declined comment, saying he had been advised by his attorney not to speak.

Mark Daush, a lawyer for the funeral home, also declined comment on the board's action.

The zoning board did not deliberate during the meeting, as it had already done so in private on the morning of July 13.

Instead, following a brief recap of the case, board member Donald Graham introduced a motion to deny the opponents' appeal on grounds that it had not been filed in a timely fashion -- within 30 days of Miller issuing the permit in June 2015.

Chairman Jack Still called for a vote. Graham voted to deny the appeal, but Still voted against Graham's motion, resulting in the 1-1 tie.

A written version of the decision is to be issued on or before Aug. 16 to all  parties involved, including the borough, Wion said.

About 35 residents attended the zoning board meeting, and council chambers was lined with signs against the crematory that have become familiar sights in many yards throughout the borough.

"You've destroyed our town so that this man can make a little money," said David Lenker, who lives in Middletown in the first block of Shirley Drive.

The crematory will be five feet from fruit trees and a garden that Jessica Hunt uses to grow food for her family, said Hunt, who lives in the 100 block of North Pine Street. A neighbor grows food in the garden for needy families, Hunt said.

"How much money are the poor people of Middletown going to have to spend to keep appealing this type of thing?" Hunt said, addressing Finkenbinder. "I think you ought to be ashamed of yourself. Why don't you put a crematory next to your house?"

Fager-Finkenbinder in October 2015 filed an application for an air quality permit to operate the crematory at the site from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. DEP is continuing to review the application.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 12:38

Hits: 496

Four interview to fill seat that could be eliminated

Borough Council publicly interviewed four residents from Middletown’s First Ward who are interested in replacing Robert Louer Sr. on July 19. 

Council is expected to pick one of the applicants to fill the vacant seat during council’s next meeting Aug. 3 — unless council moves forward with a proposal by Mayor James H. Curry III to reduce the size of council (see related article).

Six First Ward residents applied, and four were interviewed July 19: Richard Jefferies, Rachelle Reid, David Scully, and Cathy Winter.  Tom Strohm and Sean Vaccarino were unable to attend.

Council also set the timetable for filling a second empty seat — the one representing the Third Ward vacated by the resignation of Ed Shull. Council accepted Shull’s resignation July 19.

Interested Third Ward residents have until Aug. 1 to apply to the borough to fill Shull's seat. Council plans to fill the seat during its Aug. 16 meeting.


Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 15:15

Hits: 442

Route 230/Swatara Creek bridge project won’t be finished until 2017, PennDOT says

SwataraCreekBridge2 WEBPress And Journal Photo by Eric Wise — The reconstruction of the bridge that carries Route 230 over Swatara Creek from Middletown into Londonderry Township won’t be completed until next spring, according to PennDOT.


The reconstruction of the bridge that carries Route 230 over Swatara Creek from Middletown into Londonderry Township will take longer than expected, PennDOT officials have said.

“The Route 230 bridge project over the Swatara Creek will not wrap up in October as originally scheduled,” said Greg Penny, PennDOT spokesman. “It is likely to run into at least late spring of next year.”

Construction crews began demolition for the first phase of the project late in 2015, closing the 75-year-old bridge’s eastbound and pedestrian lanes. 

The crumbling decking and rusted girders were removed and replaced on the eastbound lanes. A 2015 inspection of the old bridge rated both the decking and substructure of the bridge as 4 of 10, or “poor,” indicating a structurally deficient bridge.

The project was first delayed by having the bridge beams fabricated and delivered, Penny said. 

“It could be that there is so much bridge work going on, that the fabricators are having trouble keeping up with demand and making their deliveries on time,” he said.

Additional delays occurred in technical aspects of project, concerning “tolerance issues with the beams and issues with the proposed deck grades,” Penny said.

Construction has proceeded to where the concrete for the bridge decking was poured July 20, Penny said. The concrete must cure and PennDOT must complete the moving of underground utility lines before construction moves to Phase 2. At that point, demolition will begin at the end of August or beginning of September of the westbound lanes on the remaining old section of the bridge.

“Swatara Creek Road will remain closed until the bridge is restored to two lanes next year,” Penny said.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 15:12

Hits: 422

Mayor wants to cut council to 7 members

Middletown Mayor James H. Curry III wants to act now to reduce the size of council from nine to seven as well as get rid of the wards in favor of at-large representation.

But he may not have the votes, based upon a poll of current councilors.

Curry said if the reduction is done now, then council would not have to fill two seats that are vacant. Councilor Robert Louer Sr. resigned effective July 1, creating a vacancy for the First Ward. Council on July 19 accepted the resignation of Ed Shull, meaning it has to fill a seat for the Third Ward.

To Curry, the two open seats mean it is the perfect time to reduce the size of council from nine to seven, as this would mean no current councilors would lose their seats. Curry said the council is too large for a town the size of Middletown, with 8,900 residents.

He said the system of requiring that three people on council be elected to represent each of the three wards is outdated. In a time when people have cellphones, email and Facebook, you no longer need to have someone living in your own neighborhood to represent you, the mayor contends. At-large councilors would serve the entire borough without restrictions on where they live.

Support is scattered
But the seven-member council is split on the issue. Council President Ben Kapenstein told the Press And Journal he agrees with Curry and is in favor of reducing the size of council and getting rid of the wards now — a change that council can make at any time by passing an ordinance.

The change is supported by Council Vice President Damon Suglia and by First Ward Councilor Dawn Knull.

However, three other councilors — Anne Einhorn, Diana McGlone and Ian Reddinger — oppose making the change now, although all three say the idea is worth further study.

Reddinger said he favors the idea, but wants more input to see how his residents from the Second Ward feel.

“If most of the Second Ward said no, I would vote on their behalf, even though I feel it is a smart move,” Reddinger said.

Einhorn and McGlone both favor putting the issue on the ballot as a referendums, although that could not be done until 2017.

The council can’t take a final vote on a change to its makeup at its next meeting, which is Aug. 3. A council member at the Aug. 3 meeting would have to make a motion to draft a proposal. The soonest a vote could take place would be its meeting after that.

Shouldn’t be a ‘whim’
Curry brought up the issue during council’s July 19 meeting and said that he had discussed reducing the size of council and getting rid of the wards with Solicitor Adam Santucci and with “every council member” at one time or another.

But McGlone afterward told the Press And Journal the first she had heard of it was when Curry brought it up at the meeting.

“We have no legal opinion. The solicitor wasn’t even there (during the July 19 meeting), there’s been no background done no research done,” McGlone said. “You cannot continue to demand motions or actions without any thought process behind it.”

“You need to chart a course of action and plan for these things and do the proper research and analysis, so when you do come out we have the facts, we have the statistics to back it up that council should do this,” McGlone said. “It’s a lengthy process, not something that can occur on a whim, because you don’t know all the ramifications that could follow.”

Council’s seventh member, longtime mayor and now First Ward Councilor Robert Reid, said during the July 19 meeting that the ward system has served residents well for generations and he sees no reason for change.

Reid also contended that getting rid of the wards would essentially disenfranchise residents of the First Ward.

“When you say we are going to select from at large, then you have everyone coming from one end of the town,” Reid said. “People in this end of the town are not going to be happy with their representation because they have no representation.”

‘We are far too big’
Curry did come to the July 19 meeting with statistics to support his contention that Middletown has too many elected officials for a town its size, compared to other area municipalities.

For example, Hummelstown has about 2,500 people and is served by a five-member council, Curry said. Londonderry Township has about 5,200 people and is governed by five elected officials, Lower Swatara Township has five board members for about 8,200 residents, Elizabethtown Borough has six elected officials for a town of about 11,000, and just seven elected officials govern Swatara Township, which has about 23,000 residents.

Derry Township, home of one of the biggest tourist attractions in the state if not the entire country, has just five supervisors to govern almost 25,000 residents, Curry said. Even the state capital of Harrisburg with nearly 50,000 people only needs seven councilors, the mayor added.

“We are far too big,” Curry said of the nine-member council. “I think it adds to the length of meetings. It’s difficult to have 10 people (nine councilors plus the mayor) giving their opinions. I think we could be much more efficient with less people.”

This wasn’t the first time in recent months that Curry has pushed for a smaller council. Earlier this year in arguing for getting rid of the Middletown Industrial and Commercial Development Authority, Curry said that with nine members council has enough people to handle economic development issues — if all nine councilors would pull their weight.

As for the wards, besides his contention that they are outdated, Curry said that the current system makes it harder to fill council vacancies, and to get people elected to the council in general.

The number of people truly interested in serving on council from throughout the entire town is probably no more than about 50, Curry said.

“You are limiting your talent pool when you say we have two vacancies and we have to take them from the First or Third Ward,” both of which have been “decimated” by a loss of residents since the 2011 flooding, Curry said during the July 19 meeting. “What if the most talented people are in the Second Ward? You are really limiting what choices you have because you are forcing a choice in a ward simply because you have to.”

Knull lent support to Curry’s contention regarding a loss of population in the First Ward.

“We have lost seven to eight blocks if not more” not just from the flooding but from properties acquired by Harrisburg International Airport through HIA’s noise abatement program, Knull said. That’s “at least 60 people we’ve lost.”

Moreover, Knull said that she responds to the concerns of all borough residents, regardless of whether they live in the First Ward.
“If I am going to work for the entire community, then why not let the entire community make a vote for me?” Knull asked.

Suglia, in comments after the meeting, told the Press And Journal that the ward system creates artificial boundaries that “further divide the town.”

“We are all equal in this town,” he said. “Not one person is better than another due to income level or social status. We are all one and we are all here to achieve a common goal of moving forward. The way to do that is to make us one town, not three separate wards. We were elected by the people to make these types of changes.”

Suglia also found it ironic that Reid said there is no problem with the ward system — noting that the former mayor felt it necessary to wage a write-in campaign to give First Ward voters a choice beyond the two candidates who were on the ballot.
“He’s a perfect example of why there shouldn’t be any wards,” Suglia said.

‘Like a slap in the face’
McGlone lashed out at Curry during the meeting for bringing up the issue on a night when four people from the First Ward had shown up to be interviewed to fill Louer’s seat. Six First Ward residents applied in all, but two were unable to make the meeting.

“If I had known that this s--- was going to occur right before these people who have volunteered their time to step up to serve this council that this was going to occur now, I would not have come and been the fifth person to make a quorum,” McGlone said. “If you want to do something like this that’s fine (but) this is not the time to do it.”

One of the six applicants seeking Louer’s seat — David Scully — called Curry’s comments “elitist.”

“I took real offense to the comment that maybe some wards have more talent than others. It seemed to be a swipe at the First Ward,” Scully said. “Maybe you (Curry) want people you and your friends from your neighborhood to run the town.”

“It’s like a slap in my face,” said Rachelle Reid, another First Ward applicant seeking to replace Louer.

She said many residents in the First Ward don’t use computers or cellphones or social media but still prefer “to walk right up to my front door and knock on it” if they have a concern.

“You’re going to have to let the residents make that choice” and let voters decide in a ballot referendum whether they want to keep the wards or go with an at-large system.

Curry’s comments also touched a nerve with Kay Wealand, a lifelong resident of the First Ward.

“We have always been considered the trash of Middletown because we live below the tracks,” she said. “I resent that. I resent that from the bottom of my heart and if I hear anybody say it I will tell them publicly, because I pay taxes to this town, I keep my property up to speed, and I don’t think that the First Ward would get the proper representation if you eliminated the wards.”

Curry then tried to say he didn’t mean to suggest that the First Ward doesn’t have as much to offer as the rest of the town — but that the ward system in general makes it harder to attract the best candidates for council, regardless of where they live.

“You limit your talent is what I said. Maybe all the talented people are in the First Ward,” the mayor said.

Another option
Kapenstein during the meeting offered a third option — keep the three wards but reduce council to seven members. Two councilors would come from each of two wards, but the ward with the largest population would have three councilors, Kapenstein said.

As the numbers stand, that would mean three councilors from the Second Ward — which Kapenstein represents — as the Second Ward is the largest of the three wards with 41 percent of the borough’s population, as of U.S. Census data that was used by the state to set House and Senate districts throughout Pennsylvania in 2012.

The First Ward has about 31 percent of the borough population; the Third Ward is now the smallest with about 28 percent of residents.

However, Kapenstein in speaking to the Press And Journal after the July 19 meeting said he would favor passing an ordinance now to get rid of the wards and to reduce the size of council.

He said that most residents he has heard from since the issue surfaced are in favor of making the change.

“The more people on council, the harder it is to get things done,” he said. He believes waiting for a referendum will take too long, in that even if voters opt for a change in 2017 it will be 2019 before it goes into effect.

“Right now is the perfect time because nobody would get taken off,” he added.

Einhorn said while she is open to the idea that change may be needed, she pointed to the six people from the First Ward applying for Louer’s seat.

“When you’ve got six people who are willing to serve on council then I don’t see where we have a complaint about not being able to fill seats,” she said.

She also doesn’t think that reducing council by two members will make things more efficient, because in Einhorn’s view the longer meetings don’t have to do with the size of council.

Instead, it has to do with residents being given more of a voice than they had over the past four years under the council led by former President Chris McNamara, Einhorn said.

Moreover, the new council is “probably more concerned with details” than the former council was, also adding to the length of meetings, Einhorn said.

“We want to know everything about an issue before we vote on it. If that’s what it takes to deal with the issues we inherited that are pretty complicated, then that’s what it takes,” she said.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 14:32

Hits: 465