Written by Eric Wise
Presidential actions and federal government spending make a great impact on the United States’ economy, but not all of the current candidates’ ideas will work out as intended, according to four economic experts who discussed the issues Sept. 28 at Penn State Harrisburg.
As a start, the U.S. economy is doing quite well, especially coming out of the financial crisis or “Great Recession,” said Dr. Nihal Bayraktar, associate professor of economics at Penn State Harrisburg.
“America’s economy is the strongest in the rich world,” she said.
This contrasts the vision of Donald Trump.
“His diagnoses are wrong,” she said. “The way he explains the current economic conditions does not reconcile with the facts.”
Trump’s plans to cut spending while drastically cutting taxes are “not feasible,” Bayraktar said. “I don’t know how it’s going to happen.”
Trump plans to cut 1 percent of federal spending per year, except for Social Security and the military.
“He doesn’t have any clear economic policies, and he doesn’t explain much,” she said.
At the same time, Trump promises to lower the corporate tax rate to 15 percent and eliminate the federal estate tax. For income tax, Trump’s plan will see to it that “top earners will gain much more than other groups,” she said. “What he’s promising will cause more pain with little growth.”
She showed projections of how the federal debt will grow dramatically more under Trump’s policies than those espoused by Hillary Clinton.
In contrast, Clinton has called for an increase in corporate taxes and closing tax loopholes that allow the wealthy to avoid taxes. Clinton has called for major federal investments in infrastructure and energy, and to improve communities with persistent, generational poverty. Jobs created under Clinton’s plans would come from middle level income earners.
“Most of the jobs are created by the middle income group,” she said. In contrast to repeated claims to the contrary, “top earners do not really create many jobs,” she said.
When it comes to health care policies, government costs would go up under both Trump and Clinton, said Sabri Yilmaz, instructor in economics at Penn State.
Trump’s plan to repeal and replace will cost about $500 billion, while Clinton’s expansion of Medicaid and other changes under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will cost about $300 billion, Yilmaz said. However, the costs under Trump’s policy are harder to estimate because some of the details remain unclear.
In overall health care policy, Trump’s plan could bring an additional net cost of $50 billion to the federal budget, while Clinton’s plan could add a net cost of $150 million. Those figures are dependent on the two campaigns’ projections for savings in other areas.
Yilmaz bemoaned the lack of honesty with the American people when it comes to the future of Social Security. Clinton and Trump have repeatedly stuck to a similar position that would require “no fundamental changes” to Social Security, Yilmaz said. However, as a larger and larger segment of the population hits the Social Security benefit age and retires, a smaller pool of workers supports them, Yilmaz said. Over time, this is unsustainable, and the longer politicians (not just presidential candidates) wait to address it, the more drastic changes will be to correct it.
“They have to cut benefits at some point, and retirement age will have to increase,” Yilmaz said. “They need votes right now, so they are not saying.”
When it comes to education, the candidates’ positions are dramatically different.
Clinton has proposed an additional $700 billion in education spending. She wants to provide free community college, “debt-free” public universities and introducing a program to halt the “school to prison pipeline” for certain communities, said Indrit Hoxha, associate professor economics.
The push for higher education may result in more students enrolling in college who will never finish, Hoxha said.
Trump’s educational ideas call for the end of Common Core standards, downsizing or eliminating the federal Department of Education and getting the federal government out of the business of profiting from student loans.
Trump has called for lower taxes as a remedy for providing more factories, more hiring and more jobs. Clinton focused on a $10 billion plan to keep jobs in the U.S., her “Make it in America” program and an “exit tax” on companies that take jobs to other countries, Hoxha said.
Considering the approaches of both Trump and Clinton, Hoxha cited an analysis provided by Moody’s Analytics that showed Clinton would lead to far more jobs, while Trump would add far fewer jobs to the economy, perhaps even losing jobs at times.
Despite assertions that Trump and Clinton have contrasting ideas about international trade, they hold closer views than you might think, said David Bueller, an expert on international trade and assistant professor of economics. Both oppose the Trans Pacific Partnership and understand the faults of the North American Free Trade Agreement, he said. However, Trump frequently stresses “the negative aspects of imports without mentioning the positives,” he said.
Buehler also said that over the past few years, the percentage of foreign born residents in the United States has crept back to where it has been historically. “Overall, immigration tends to have a very positive effect on growth,” Buehler said. Trump has made immigration one of his key issues, demanding the construction of a wall and the immediate deportation of all criminal aliens. Clinton has focused on a policy that would enforce immigration laws humanely, he said.
Regardless of the outcome of the election, the next president will face challenges in the economy, including a budget deficit and high federal debt, the poverty and income inequality in the country and increasing competition in the international arena, Bayraktar said.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 October 2016 15:25
Written by Jason Maddux
Dylan Bower wasn’t in the debate hall when Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump squared off last week at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. But he was just about as close as you can come.
Bower, a senior at Hofstra majoring in finance, volunteered in the media filing center in an adjacent area to the debate location. That’s where almost all of the media — about a thousand members, he said — watched the first debate between the two presidential candidates, and where Trump talked to media after the debate was over.
The 2013 Middletown Area High School graduate assisted media outlets with whatever they needed, from getting set up at the site to helping them connect electronically.
“When you get to work at the media center like that, pretty much every news person from every channel pretty much was there,” he said. “I got to see a lot of the newspeople, see how they did their broadcasts.”
He said the experience during the debate was “really interesting.” Very few media were allowed in the debate hall, so most were working from the media center.
“It was very quiet. All you pretty much hear was people typing on their computers, everyone trying to post stuff to social media and trying to blog everything,” he said.
“Overall it was a really great experience and something I was really glad to be a part of because something like that doesn’t come along every day,” he added.
He said he had a good discussion with Bret Baier from Fox News prior to the debate.
“I was with the Hofstra TV people. We were just walking around and ran into him outside. He stopped and talked to us. Really nice guy,” he said.
Baier discussed the experience as a whole and how great of an opportunity it is for young people to be able to be there for one of the biggest political events in recent history, Bower said.
“He said it was a really great opportunity and we should take advantage of it,” Bower said.
He didn’t get to see either candidate in person. He said Clinton “just came and left,” although Trump did come to the media center afterward. But Bower said he was stationed too far in the back to get to see him.
He was able to see Megyn Kelly of Fox News and Wolf Blitzer of CNN on the air from where he worked.
He also had a brief interaction with Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who started out the campaign season supporting Trump but was at the debate as a strong Clinton supporter.
Everyone who had tickets for the debate had to meet at a location off campus and then they were shuttled to the debate hall, Bower said.
“I got sent over there for a few hours to screen people’s clothing to make sure everything was appropriate,” he said. There were no problems. “Everyone was pretty well dressed.”
Cuban walked in the door and he said “hi” to Bower. He also saw Cuban later in the media center.
Bower’s work wasn’t done just during the debate. He said his days were “chaotic,” including working from 5 a.m. until after midnight on debate day, as well as long days the two days before.
“But in the end I think it was all really worth it, especially if you are interested in communications and media like that, or even politics.
“Seeing how they put something of this magnitude together. From watching them build the stage over the last couple days. Watching all the media setting up outside. Even just seeing the security. It was pretty much on lockdown. It was just a really cool opportunity,” he said.
As he heads toward graduation, Bower said he’s not sure what is next. Although he is majoring in finance, he enjoys the communications business as well.
“I’m into doing sports anchoring and sportscasting. But I’m also interested in the business side. I want to go into entertainment or media. I just don’t know if it’s a sports anchor or news anchor position or the business side,” he said.
Over the summer, he interned with Jason Bristol at CBS 21 in the sports department. He worked at WRHU FM Radio, the Hofstra student radio station. It has the unique arrangement of being the flagship station for the New York Islanders NHL team.
During the 2014-15 season, Bower said he was the producer, in charge of all the Islanders broadcasts. He said he helped out with reporting at practices and interview players, and work as an on-site engineer. He said he has not been as involved in the past year as he focuses on his major.
“Between the debate and the Islanders, I got two unique opportunities that other college students do not get to do. They are by far the greatest memories I’ll have coming out of college and they’ll be stories I’ll be able to tell for a long time,” he said.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 October 2016 14:43
Part of Swatara Creek Road in Londonderry Township is being closed to traffic during weekdays so a contractor can install a fire hydrant on Red Bridge Road.
Starting this week the road is being closed from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, according to Joseph Woodward of Pennsylvania American Water Co. The road will be open to traffic after 5 p.m. on weekdays, and on weekends.
The project will take about four weeks to complete, Woodward said. The fire hydrant is to help ensure an adequate supply of water in the area in case of emergency, he said.
The work is also part of extending a 16-inch water line to get water service to the Vine Street corridor and ultimately to Route 230 to meet future development needs, according to Steve Letavic, Londonderry Township manager.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 October 2016 09:50
Written by Dan Miller
If you’ve never walked in the shoes of a breast cancer survivor, you may have your best chance on Saturday, Oct. 8 when Helen Michener comes to Middletown.
Michener, 70, is walking from Philadelphia to the Capitol building in Harrisburg from Oct. 3-9 to raise money to fight breast cancer and to promote awareness of the Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition.
Michener is encouraging supporters to walk along with her. She expects to pass the Giant in Midtown Plaza along East Main Street between 3 and 4 p.m. on Saturday, Oct. 8. From there she will head toward the Sheetz on Route 230, where she will end her walk for the day between 5 and 6 p.m.
Michener — who lives in Shermans Dale in Perry County — was diagnosed with breast cancer in October 2013.
She has done several 60-mile walks for breast cancer before, but she has never done a walk this long.
“I realized that by embracing the community I was now part of was the best way to live the new life I had,” Michener told the Press And Journal in an email. “When I turned 70 I thought it would be good to have a physical challenge, so I decided to do this walk.”
You can learn more about Helen and her walk by going to her Facebook page for the event, and by going to www.PABreastCancer.org.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 October 2016 14:59
Written by Eric Wise
Two development projects in Lower Swatara Township might get off the ground this fall if improvements are made from sewer lines from the township to Highspire.
The township has been awaiting the Lumber Street interceptor upgrade for its sewer line for some time, although it is slowly moving forward.
“(Highspire Public Works) just received the permits from the DEP,” said John McHale, Highspire borough manager. “They have been waiting for the permit, and the plan is to bid the project in the next one to two months.”
The need for this sewage system upgrade has been holding up the construction of the Fulling Mill Retirement Community, an 81-unit project on 27 acres at Nissley Drive and Fulling Mill Road in the township. The sewage issue has delayed the project since at least 2007, when Lower Swatara’s commissioners gave their blessing to the preliminary development plans.
A second development, William’s Manor, will be considered again by Oct. 19 by the commissioners, who have granted extensions from earlier this year due to the lack of progress with the sewage upgrade.
Robert Fisher and Associates drew up the plans for Williams Manor, which will features 26 single-family building lots on 10 acres along Lumber Street south of Route 283.
The township planning commission reviewed the plans in March and April, recommending the commissioners’ approval at the second meeting, pending the completion of various requirements that include the sewage system upgrade.
One new street will connect the P-shaped development to Lumber Street, with eight homes inside where the street loops around itself and the others lining the street to fill the 10 acres. About half of the homes will have drainage from rooftops to front-yard rain gardens to help control runoff following storms.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 04 October 2016 15:49