locally owned since 1854

Readers' Views: Evolution is a fairy tale for adults

Posted 2/12/13

Editor,

 

Hitler would give an A-plus to the evolutionists for following his instructions. Hitler said, “A lie should be so colossal that no one would believe that someone could have the impudence to distort the truth so …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Readers' Views: Evolution is a fairy tale for adults

Posted

Editor,

Hitler would give an A-plus to the evolutionists for following his instructions. Hitler said, “A lie should be so colossal that no one would believe that someone could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”

Evolution certainly is a big lie that would even exceed Hitler’s expectations. How could all those scientists be wrong? Would they lie? Are they gifted people and don’t really need proof for their conclusions?  

Evolution is defined as a change in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations as a result of natural selection acting on the genetic variation among individuals, and resulting in the development of new species.

Of course, this supposedly corrects the Bible in that God mentioned seven times that each species was created in its own kind. The evolutionists say this is a mistake. The great Jewish philosopher Moses Maimonides says,

“Regarding all other prophets, God spoke to them through intermediaries. Regarding Moses, it was without one, as it says, ‘face to face I spoke to him.’ ''

Sometimes evolutionists make the mistake of telling the truth. You will find not only isn’t evolution a fact, it’s not even a theory. A theory has to have some scientific empirical evidence. Evolution is a postulate. A postulate accepts something is true with no observable scientific evidence.

In his book, “The Blind Watchmaker,'' Richard Dawkins, the leading evolutionist of the day, said, “But in this chapter we are asking how improbable, how miraculous, a single event we are allowed to postulate. What is the largest single event of sheer naked coincidence, sheer miraculous unadulterated luck that we are allowed to get away with in our own theories, and still say we have a satisfactory explanation of life?” He can’t believe we could be so naive.
He’s not the only one to slip up and tell the truth.

The infamous Pierre Tielhard  participated in the Piltdown Man scandal, as he was the one who filed down the teeth of an ape to make them look human. The bones and teeth were also chemically treated to give the appearance of being ancient. Tielhard said, “Evolution is a general postulate to which all theories, all hypotheses, all systems must henceforward bow and which they must satisfy in order to be thinkable and true.’’

Evolutionist Niles Eldridge admits, “Many trends, in other words, may exist more in the minds of the analysts than in phylogenetic history.” The definition of phylogenetic is relating to or based on evolutionary development.

It is clearly against the philosophy of these scientists to admit there is a God. Herman Biondi and Thomas Gold admitted not being able to philosophically accept the Big Bang Theory because it showed there was a creator.

Nobel winner George Wald admits, “There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility.  Spontaneous generation – that life arose from non-living matter – was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God.”

The vast majority of the scientific community knows there is no evolution, but can’t admit there is a God.  

The famous preacher, Charles Spurgeon, said it best: “You are not to be dogmatical in theology, my brethren, it is wicked; but for scientific men it is the correct thing. You are never to assert anything very strongly; but scientists may boldly assert what they cannot prove.”

How sad it is that all over the world, millions of young people renounce the sacred history of Genesis for what Larry Azar, the great philosopher and critic of evolution, rightly called “a fairy tale for adults.’’

                                     

                                      Andrew Burger
                                      Middletown