locally owned since 1854

Rolling back Clean Water Act would be devastating: Nancy Stoner

Posted 6/5/19

For nearly 50 years, the federal Clean Water Act’s definition of which water bodies are protected from pollution has enabled states and local communities to safeguard our nation’s rivers, …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Rolling back Clean Water Act would be devastating: Nancy Stoner

Tubers and kayakers enjoy the Potomac River near its confluence with the Shennandoah River at Harpers Ferry.
Tubers and kayakers enjoy the Potomac River near its confluence with the Shennandoah River at Harpers Ferry.
Photo by David Harp/chesapeakephotos.com
Posted

For nearly 50 years, the federal Clean Water Act’s definition of which water bodies are protected from pollution has enabled states and local communities to safeguard our nation’s rivers, streams, wetlands and other waterways.

The value of clean water was broadly appreciated and understood. President George W. Bush implemented his father’s vision of no net loss of wetlands. President Barack Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency sought to clarify and simplify the definition of “Waters of the United States” in 2015 to protect invaluable sources of drinking water and critical wildlife habitat.

But now, in the blink of an eye, President Donald Trump’s EPA threatens to undo all of the progress we’ve made cleaning up and protecting our nation’s treasured waters.

The EPA is proposing to drastically limit the scope of the Clean Water Act and gut existing clean water protections at the behest of polluting industries that profit from weak regulation. The new rule would remove the federal protection of at least 40 percent of the country’s rivers, streams and freshwater wetlands, undermining the protection that provided greatly improved water quality in many of our waterways.

The Potomac River’s vast improvement in water quality, wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities has largely been driven by implementation of the Clean Water Act, one of our nation’s most effective environmental statutes.

The new rule purports to create “clarity, predictability and consistency” in defining “waters of the United States.” Instead, it simply defines away nearly half of the waters of our country from protection, taking away the public’s right to clean water. We have come too far to undo decades of critical protections that cleaned our rivers and streams and stopped pollution.

The Clean Water Act is designed to ensure that Americans could go anywhere and be confident that they could drink the tap water, eat the fish they caught and go swimming. While we have not yet realized that goal, we are making great progress, and the Clean Water Act is responsible for much of it.

The new rule would take away Americans’ right to clean water protections and replace them with the right of polluters to destroy or degrade 40 percent of the country’s streams, lakes and wetlands.

No scientific basis supports the Trump EPA’s rule. It would eliminate express protection for waters that flow through more than one state and remove protection for ephemeral streams — those that exist from rainfall or snowmelt and form the headwaters of watersheds.

In the West, 80 percent to 90 percent of streams are ephemeral. Closer to home, 60 percent of Virginia streams would lose their shield — especially headwater streams in the Shenandoah and Upper Potomac regions of the Potomac’s 14,000-square-mile watershed.

These are integral to providing habitat for trout and other popular species, not to mention clean drinking water for almost 6 million people downstream.

Miney Branch, which flows into the Potomac by way of Tom’s Creek and the Monocacy River, and Quail Run in the Shenandoah River watershed are merely two examples of thousands of streams in our watershed that would be more vulnerable than ever to pollution.

The rule would also eliminate federal protection for most wetlands.

In Virginia, for example, we estimate that up to 80 percent of freshwater wetlands could lose federal protection.

Wetlands are the kidneys of the stream system, absorbing as much as 1 million gallons of water for every acre. They serve as natural pollution filters, buffers for flooding and critical habitat for migratory waterfowl and other birds. When wetlands are lost, the public suffers from increased flooding, loss of habitat and more pollution — not to mention footing the bill for the expensive and far less effective infrastructure that tries to replace the wetlands functions that have been lost.

The Clean Water Act has played a seminal role in setting us back on the path to clean, healthy rivers, streams and wetlands that provide drinking water, wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities for millions of Americans.

Gone are the days when the Cuyahoga River burned, the lower Potomac was called a “national disgrace,” and the Chesapeake Bay was profoundly polluted, yet Trump’s EPA wants to dismantle the protections that enabled such great progress.

Our waterways belong to all of us, not to polluters. We need to stand up and defeat this rollback of clean water protections.

Nancy Stoner is president of the Potomac Riverkeeper Network. Her views are not necessarily those of the Bay Journal.