locally owned since 1854

When it comes to drawing district maps, this is reform?: Mike Folmer

Posted 2/7/18

The outcry to change how Pennsylvania draws congressional and General Assembly district maps began soon after the 2016 presidential election.

Redistricting reform has long been a goal of mine. As …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

When it comes to drawing district maps, this is reform?: Mike Folmer

Posted

The outcry to change how Pennsylvania draws congressional and General Assembly district maps began soon after the 2016 presidential election.

Redistricting reform has long been a goal of mine. As chairman of the Senate State Government Committee, I was looking forward to scheduling public hearings across the commonwealth on the proposed bills to change the redistricting process.

Some of those interested in redistricting reform decided they didn’t want to wait for the legislative process. When lawsuits were filed to challenge the constitutionality of the 2011 maps, I put the hearings on hold. It’s next to impossible to have a good public discussion while an issue is being litigated.

During the court proceedings, my staff and I met with many citizens and advocacy groups to discuss their support for various redistricting changes. I am perplexed by comments from some advocates. Most surprising were two board members from the Pennsylvania League of Women Voters who told me they had not read the bill they support. They could not explain how it would work. They couldn’t express why it’s better than other bills under consideration.

Other advocates surprised me when they declared voters could not be trusted to select delegates to a proposed citizens’ redistricting commission. They argued “party bosses” would take over. They seem to have forgotten I was opposed by the party establishment.

I have yet to meet someone who will address my biggest concern: If a revamped commission is unable to draw new maps, lines would be drawn by a “special master.” How does having one unelected person drawing maps constitute “reform?”

Thanks to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, we all may soon get an answer to this question. If the General Assembly isn’t able to get new maps to the governor by Feb. 9 and if the governor doesn’t approve a plan by Feb. 15, the court will draw the lines. They already have a “special adviser” — again, just one person. This is “reform?”

I’m shocked by the court’s lack of respect for our Constitution. Article III, Section 4 mandates: “every bill shall be considered on three different days in each House.” To meet this constitutional requirement, the Senate was forced to consider a bill with no details — just a shell to meet the court’s unreasonable timelines. How unfortunate.

The court has also stepped on Article IV, Section 15 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which gives the governor 10 days to sign or veto a bill. Should the General Assembly get him legislation to meet the court’s timelines, he’ll now have less than 10 days to act.

So, here we are in the quest for fair districts — faced with an unreasonable timeline that doesn’t allow for openness and transparency, no details on how to draw the new lines so as to meet court expectations, little rationale of how the court imagines the Constitution was violated or how it will evaluate if any new maps meet its currently secret definition of what’s constitutional and what is not, and the distinct possibility one person will be redrawing District maps.

I want to meet the person who calls this “reform.”

Mike Folmer is a Republican member of the Pennsylvania Senate whose 48th District includes Middletown. His Capitol office telephone number is 717-787-5708.